벤치마크
The overhead of policy enforcement is benchmarked in model_b_test.go. The testbed is:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz, 2601 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s)
The benchmarking result of go test -bench=. -benchmem is as follows (op = an Enforce() call, ms = millisecond, KB = kilo bytes):
| Test case | Rule size | Time overhead (ms/op) | Memory overhead (KB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACL | 2 rules (2 users) | 0.015493 | 5.649 |
| RBAC | 5 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.021738 | 7.522 |
| RBAC (small) | 1100 rules (1000 users, 100 roles) | 0.164309 | 80.620 |
| RBAC (medium) | 11000 rules (10000 users, 1000 roles) | 2.258262 | 765.152 |
| RBAC (large) | 110000 rules (100000 users, 10000 roles) | 23.916776 | 7,606 |
| RBAC with resource roles | 6 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.021146 | 7.906 |
| RBAC with domains/tenants | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role, 2 domains) | 0.032696 | 10.755 |
| ABAC | 0 rule (0 user) | 0.007510 | 2.328 |
| RESTful | 5 rules (3 users) | 0.045398 | 91.774 |
| Deny-override | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.023281 | 8.370 |
| Priority | 9 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.016389 | 5.313 |
The overhead of policy enforcement of Casbin CPP is benchmarked in tests/benchmarks directory with the help of Google's benchmarking tool. The testbed for these benchmarks is:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6300HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz, 4 cores, 4 threads
Here is the benchmarking result of executing casbin_benchmark target built in Release configuration (op = an enforce() call, ms = millisecond):
| Test case | Rule size | Time overhead (ms/op) |
|---|---|---|
| ACL | 2 rules (2 users) | 0.0195 |
| RBAC | 5 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.0288 |
| RBAC (small) | 1100 rules (1000 users, 100 roles) | 0.300 |
| RBAC (medium) | 11000 rules (10000 users, 1000 roles) | 2.113 |
| RBAC (large) | 110000 rules (100000 users, 10000 roles) | 21.450 |
| RBAC with resource roles | 6 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.03 |
| RBAC with domains/tenants | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role, 2 domains) | 0.041 |
| ABAC | 0 rule (0 user) | NA |
| RESTful | 5 rules (3 users) | NA |
| Deny-override | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.0246 |
| Priority | 9 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.035 |
Lua Casbin's overhead of policy enforcement is benchmarked in bench.lua. The testbed was a Ubuntu VM with the CPU:
AMD Ryzen(TM) 5 4600H CPU @ 3.0GHz, 6 Cores, 12 Threads
The benchmarking result of luajit bench.lua is as follows (op = an enforce() call, ms = millisecond):
| Test case | Rule size | Time overhead (ms/op) |
|---|---|---|
| ACL | 2 rules (2 users) | 0.0533 |
| RBAC | 5 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.0972 |
| RBAC (small) | 1100 rules (1000 users, 100 roles) | 0.8598 |
| RBAC (medium) | 11000 rules (10000 users, 1000 roles) | 8.6848 |
| RBAC (large) | 110000 rules (100000 users, 10000 roles) | 90.3217 |
| RBAC with resource roles | 6 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.1124 |
| RBAC with domains/tenants | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role, 2 domains) | 0.1978 |
| ABAC | 0 rule (0 user) | 0.0305 |
| RESTful | 5 rules (3 users) | 0.1085 |
| Deny-override | 6 rules (2 users, 1 role) | 0.1934 |
| Priority | 9 rules (2 users, 2 roles) | 0.1437 |